There's also other reasons for its reception like removal of MS-DOS mode (which can be brought back with a patch), and initially buggy System Restore. Ideally, this is what the average consumer really wants, whereas 2000 was used by businesses for the extra security and stability.Īll the negative response towards Windows Me usually stems from the press pushing this narrative onto people, but also that it introduces a new driver model that people upgrading from previous versions of 9x had incompatible drivers for (similar situation to Windows Vista's launch), but overtime, better drivers were written to fully work with Me. This allows full backwards compatibility for legacy programs and games. Unofficially, it can also still boot into MS-DOS mode through patching various files (or using the emergency boot disk) to run certain applications that require such a feature. Whereas Windows Millennium Edition still uses the 9x kernel, and is built on top of DOS. In that regard, it can't run all legacy software 100% correctly. I typically don't respond to reviews such as these, but there's so much misconception I'm seeing that I feel the need to fight the establishment and point out some things: Firstly, Windows 2000 is NT-based, and thus uses an emulation subsystem to run MS-DOS and Win16 based software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |